Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 06:07:13 -0800 (PST) From: the_dojang-request@martialartsresource.net Subject: The_Dojang digest, Vol 9 #82 - 8 msgs X-Mailer: Mailman v2.0.8 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain To: the_dojang@martialartsresource.net Sender: the_dojang-admin@martialartsresource.net Errors-To: the_dojang-admin@martialartsresource.net X-BeenThere: the_dojang@martialartsresource.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: the_dojang@martialartsresource.net X-Reply-To: the_dojang@martialartsresource.net List-Help: List-Post: X-Subscribed-Address: rterry@idiom.com List-Subscribe: List-Id: The Internet's premier discussion forum on Korean Martial Arts. List-Unsubscribe: Status: OR Send The_Dojang mailing list submissions to the_dojang@martialartsresource.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://martialartsresource.net/mailman/listinfo/the_dojang or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to the_dojang-request@martialartsresource.net You can reach the person managing the list at the_dojang-admin@martialartsresource.net When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of The_Dojang digest..." <<--------------- The_Dojang mailing list --------------->> Serving the Internet since June 1994. Copyright 1994-2002: Ray Terry and Martial Arts Resource The Internet's premier discussion forum devoted to Korean Martial Arts. See the Korean Martial Arts (KMA) FAQ and the online search engine for back issues of The_Dojang at http://MartialArtsResource.com Pil Seung! Today's Topics: 1. RE: Master Rim (Creed71963@aol.com) 2. Changes through the generations (Andrew Pratt) 3. Flight Attendant self defense (TNTcombatives@aol.com) 4. Choke Holds (TNTcombatives@aol.com) 5. Re: Changes through the generations (Ray Terry) 6. Syngman Rhee (Andrew Pratt) 7. Re: Original Hapkido (Sun Mu Kwan-USA) 8. Re: Questions (Carsten Jorgensen) --__--__-- Message: 1 From: Creed71963@aol.com Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 21:19:31 EST To: the_dojang@martialartsresource.net Subject: [The_Dojang] RE: Master Rim Reply-To: the_dojang@martialartsresource.net >Message: 4 >Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 16:08:26 -0600 >From: "Bruce Sims" >To: >Subject: [The_Dojang] Re: A little help, please >Reply-To: the_dojang@martialartsresource.net > >Dear Ray: > >********************* > >[[Pg. 24 identifies a Master Rim, Jong-bae as chief instructor for Hapkidos' >founder Choi, Yong Sul for 10 years. Other than Marc Tedeschi and the Rim >website does anyone authenticate this standing with something other than >the fact that folks sat down over coffee once?]] I passed a copy of this Email on to my Instructor, as he hapens to know Master Rim, as one of several unrelated questions regarding KMAs. I received his reply tonight. I reposted here in it's entirety: ********** Dear Craig, Master Rim was a very close friend and student of the late Master Doju Choi. He did serve as the senior instructor for him in Taegu South Korea. When Master Choi would visit the U.S. he would always make a point to visit Master Rim in Baltimore. In fact his last visit was in 1989 the year he died. Tell Bruce that I know Master Rim and his top student Master Joe Sheya very well and that is the truth. There are many deceptions of the truth by those who are trying to promote themselves and organizations. Master Rim is not one of them.He is a committed Martial Artist, family man, and is deeply religious. He lives a very modeat life style. I think Bruce and others may not be happy as they over turn stones seeking the truth only to find deception. We should instead focus on training and seeking the truth that resides in each of us. Master Choi is the only true founder and inventor of Korean Hap Ki Do. The others who have followed under him who claim to be the founders are merely incorporating his teachings into their own. Let's be honest about it. He is the father they are the sons. My system of han guk Mu Sool incorporates several different Korean weapons to include the sword knife, cane, fan, rope, spear, broad sword, and stick techniques from 10 inches to 6 feet. I have not invented a new style just incorporated others teachings into a collective work. I hope that this has helped you in your research. Please pass this information on to Bruce. Sincerely, Master Al Gauthier President of KMARA WWW.KMARA.ORG ************ Please note that I personally don't think that Bruce was being anything but being a healthy Skeptic regarding Master Rim's background, but to edit Master Gauthier's post in any way would be a disservice. (Thought I was tempted to do so.) Craig --__--__-- Message: 2 From: "Andrew Pratt" To: "dojang" Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 11:43:13 +0900 Subject: [The_Dojang] Changes through the generations Reply-To: the_dojang@martialartsresource.net Ali, You contributed in a recent Dojang Digest: > I find it very interesting that the founder of kuk sool won and his brother GM In Sun Seo both have books covering geum moo hyung but they are shown quite different from each other. GM In Sun Seo stances are much wider and deeper than GM In Hyuk Suh. Also, some of the techniques in the red book (GM Seo's) are a little different than the black book (GM Suh's). < This sounds very similar to the changes that occurred in Shotokan Karate when Funakoshi's son took over the reigns. The stances became the low and long stances we see today. If you look at the old pictures, Funakoshi senior stood much higher. There has also been a noticeable change in Aikido. Most of Morihei Ueshiba's students, including his son and grandson, have changed the stances into something longer and more static. If, however, you examine the few clips and pictures of Ueshiba actually practising then it doesn't take long to see that Ueshiba rarely maintained one formal stance. I think what I am driving at is that the difference you have noticed indicates teaching methodologies and attempts to systemise an art that is still in development and changing. There is probably also a subtle difference in understanding of the techniques between the two masters which is driving them to emphasise different stances. Ultimately, when any technique is executed it should flow naturally and achieve the desired effect. Good stance can help this but in the panic of the moment you will probably find that after you have executed the technique you will examine your stance and think, 'what the h*** am I doing standing like this?!' Hope that helps, Andrew --__--__-- Message: 3 From: TNTcombatives@aol.com Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 21:55:45 EST To: the_dojang@martialartsresource.net Subject: [The_Dojang] Flight Attendant self defense Reply-To: the_dojang@martialartsresource.net Check with Mr. Phil Messina or Elizabeth Kennedy at Modernwarrior.com. I know they have been doing flight fight training for a while. Others are doing the training as well, but I don't recommend them. Bus/train scenarios are a real chagi to do. Later, Mark. --__--__-- Message: 4 From: TNTcombatives@aol.com Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 22:16:56 EST To: the_dojang@martialartsresource.net Subject: [The_Dojang] Choke Holds Reply-To: the_dojang@martialartsresource.net Mr. Kelly One of the best sources for 'choke hold' stuff is Mr. Robert Bragg. He is the survival skills director for Washington State criminal justice training academy. He teaches an LVNR (lateral vascular neck restraint) course to law enforcement throughout the NW. The site is located at: http://www.wa.gov/cjt/ As far as it being 'illegal', I know of no law that prohibits it. Yes, many agencies have forbidden or restricted its use, but the majority that I know of allow it. It falls in the highest categories of force continuums, usually in the serious physical control section right along with K-9 bite, impact weapon, focused blows, electrical stun etc. I teach various choke methods, as well as head control techniques in my own police combatives programs. Students are required to bring their own agency force continuums. I have not seen chokes or constrictions banned in any of them. My own department allows it. It is a necessary technique to know, and a very effective tool for officers to have when faced with the decision to use that level of force to restrain/dominate a threat. If you are justified in using deadly force against a threat, changing from the side pressure on neck (LVNR/sleeper) to an arm across the front of the neck is ok. The knee in the back is mostly used for control and pinning while subject is being handcuffed. It is not a knee strike to the back, but a placement of the knee. Again, striking (focused blows) are permitted if the threats resistance is ominous and is enough to overcome officer efforts...a strike may seem reasonable and necessary at the time. Mark Gajdostik <<>> --__--__-- Message: 5 From: Ray Terry Subject: Re: [The_Dojang] Changes through the generations To: the_dojang@martialartsresource.net Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 21:26:01 PST Reply-To: the_dojang@martialartsresource.net > Ultimately, when any technique is executed it should flow naturally and > achieve the desired effect. Good stance can help this but in the panic of > the moment you will probably find that after you have executed the technique > you will examine your stance and think, 'what the h*** am I doing standing > like this?!' There you go being practical again... :) Ray Terry raymail@hpwsrt.cup.hp.com --__--__-- Message: 6 From: "Andrew Pratt" To: "dojang" Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:45:07 +0900 Subject: [The_Dojang] Syngman Rhee Reply-To: the_dojang@martialartsresource.net Terry asked in a recent Dojang Digest whether Syngman Rhee, former (and little lamented) president and independence activist (for which there is probably some grudging admiration) was a member of the royal family. No he was not. Indeed, he was so opposed to the royal family that he was a democratic campaigner before the Japanese annexed the country in 1910. He spent time in prison for his troubles before seeking exile during the Japanese period. He still had his hatred of the royal family when he was president and refused to allow the return of leading members of the royal family from Japan (where they had been kept as 'guests' by the Japanese Imperialists). Andrew --__--__-- Message: 7 Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 22:11:26 -0800 (PST) From: Sun Mu Kwan-USA To: Dojang digest Subject: [The_Dojang] Re: Original Hapkido Reply-To: the_dojang@martialartsresource.net <> One of my friends runs a gym in Busan and he told me the very same thing. Before opening his own gym, he spent four years living in his master's gym in Seoul and teaching there as well. Prior to opening his own gym, he had to attend an instructors certification course in Yong-In as well. I think here in the US, its somewhat easy to open your own gym without much approval from ones own organization/federation. Just up the money and there you go. ===== International HKD Federation-Sun Mu Kwan USA www.ushankido.org Got something to say? Say it better with Yahoo! Video Mail http://mail.yahoo.com --__--__-- Message: 8 From: "Carsten Jorgensen" To: the_dojang@martialartsresource.net Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 20:36:54 +0800 Subject: [The_Dojang] Re: Questions Reply-To: the_dojang@martialartsresource.net Me: >>Who is convinced there were no styles in Korea who used the Hapkido name until ~ 1960 when GM Kang Moon-Ji first used the name in Taegu. << Ray: >>Ummm, no one??? :) Gm Ji coined that name in 1959. << I've always heard is as GM Ji taught Yawara until 1961. Anyway, who was the first (GM Ueshiba) really doesn't matter because GM Kang only used the name for a short time (GM Choi Yong Sul told him that "he trained Yawara, not Aikido") and I agree that it's because of GM Ji and all his work and all of his students that the Hapkido name has stuck. Ray: >>Should we just agree to disagree? :) << Sure, I agree we disagree :-) The thing is, this is the very base of all the confusion. If you believe ONE person created everything in the Korean arts, then the history, the differences in techniques, syllabuses etc and all the other stuff get weird and confusing. But when you realize that there were many styles using a generic name from the beginning it all makes sense. BTW, I've received a couple of private emails that I'm not talking about GM Ji a lot. There's no disrespect in that, it's simply that we're from different lineages and there is very little GM Ji influence in my style (Hwarang Do in case anyone were in doubt ;-) , just as there is little GM Lee influence in GM Ji's style. I'm not trying to "take anything away" from GM Ji's huge influence, and GM Lee does not claim any rank in Hapkido, even though he could promote himself as one of the most senior masters. But we're talking history and there is no denying GM Lee's influence on the Korean MA's. Me: >> And that's because Hapkido never was - and never will be - *A* style. >From the very beginning (~1960) when people started using the Hapkido name in Korea, "Hapkido" was used as a generic term for very different styles. << Ray: >> Well, no, it simply fractured after being created by Gm Ji. << Well, this is the root of all the confusion as I see it. Ray: >> HRD is one of those groups that splinter off from Yawara and HKD. << I've written many LONG posts on this, please expound :-) >> Just as Gm Ji enhanced Gm Choi's Yawara to create HKD. << The style "Songmu Kwan" Hapkido (Kwan meaning style), which was an enhancement from GM Choi's Yawara. Carsten Jorgensen cj@hwarangdo.dk Copenhagen, Denmark -- _______________________________________________ Win a ski trip! http://www.nowcode.com/register.asp?affiliate=1net2phone3a --__--__-- _______________________________________________ The_Dojang mailing list The_Dojang@martialartsresource.net http://martialartsresource.net/mailman/listinfo/the_dojang It's a great day for Taekwondo! Support the USTU by joining today. US Taekwondo Union, 1 Olympic Plaza, Ste 104C, Colorado Spgs, CO 80909 719-578-4632 FAX 719-578-4642 ustutkd1@aol.com http://www.ustu.org Old digest issues are available via ftp://ftp.martialartsresource.com. Copyright 1994-2002: Ray Terry and Martial Arts Resource Standard disclaimers apply. Remember 9-11! End of The_Dojang Digest